My $7 Million Dollar Journey …

I am a little shy, which is one of the reasons why I write semi-anonymously. It’s also so that I can share specific (and, highly personal) financial information, so that you can travel a similar road, if you are so inclined …

But, some of you want to know where I came from? How is it that I could amass such a large amount ($7 million) in such a short time (7 years)?

Fair questions.

So it is for YOU that I humbly outline my $7million7year journey

I count my 7 years as starting in 1998:

By then I had resurrected a defunct family business as a sole proprietorship (I was $30k in debt and living off $50k a year) and started a new one that had real potential but was draining all the cash from the first business (and then some … combined the businesses were losing about $5k a month).

We owned our own home (well, the bank owned most of it) but had zero other investments.

I was what you would call “broke … with prospects”.

1998

Since I had no idea how to fix the situation, I did what any self-respecting person would do: I lucked upon a book!

The book was called The E-Myth Revisited by Michael Gerber and I bought it to help me get out of the hole that I was in …

… not, the financial hole – I had NO idea that the book (or any book!) could help me with that – rather the personal hole (more like hell) that I was going through working in my businesses rather than on them.

[AJC: This will be the subject for another post, but I was the classic control-freak entrepreneur (I sure as hell didn’t feel like an ‘entreprenuer’ … I was just a guy seemingly out of his depth) trying to do EVERYTHING myself … therefore, achieving NOTHING]

No, the epiphany came when I did the very first exercise in that book (and, that’s why I suggest that EVERYBODY reads it … just for that chapter) and learned the most important lesson of my financial life:

My life wasn’t about my business (or my money) … my business was there to support my life.

You have NO idea how important that was to read … and, how scary it was when the book then went on to show me how to cost that life.

You see, I realized that for the life that I wanted … actually, needed … I had to be ‘wealthy’ [AJC: damn, why couldn’t I just ‘need’ to live on a kibbutz?!].

The problem was, I had no idea how to calculate wealthy.

Fortunately, soon after I happened to go to my first ever financial seminar, and the presenter told me two things (that I simply took on face value at the time) that changed my whole life’s financial outlook:

1. To live ‘wealthy’ (nice house, cars, schools, lots of travel … no work) you need at least $250,000 a year (1998 dollars) in passive income, and

2. You need to multily that number by 20 to determine the size of your nest egg.

There you have it … $5 million … my new (first!) goal … oh sh*t!

First, the problems:

i) My businesses were small / niche businesses with limited growth potential; I calculated that I would need almost 100% penetration of the largest business prospects available in order to achieve my new goal

ii) I had just LOST my second largest client, so now I was losing $300k a year!

iii) Year 2000 was approaching and my software was no longer supported nor was it Y2K compliant.

2000

I got over the last problem by rewriting my software, which gave me the opportunity to fully internet-enable it … this enabled me to totally change by business model, and we (accidentally) ended up with one of the world’s first complete eLogistics systems.

All of a sudden, the business that was losing money MADE money and we added new clients (thus getting over the second-last problem) and soon became profitable.

2001

However, as soon as we became profitable, I bought a building for over $1.25 million, on the advice of my accountant of all people … this was very scary because:

Business 1 + Business 2 + Building 1 = break-even again!

However, the businesses (now, both) started growing and soon became reasonably profitable … $10k – $20k a month by 2002 … I still only took $50k a year in salary.

Our Net Worth was now the equity we had built up in our home and office property, plus whatever residual value our businesses had; probably $1 mill. to $2 mill. In fact, an overseas listed company made us a $2 million offer for Business 2, but we rejected it (at that time) … so, our Net Worth could have been as high as $3 Million if we sold, or if somebody else would ever offer us the same.

When it comes to businesses, do you ever know your true Net Worth until you sell?

2003

We made it all the way to $7 million over the period of 2003 to 2005 simply by:

1. Repeating the process: generating profits in the business, and

2. Retaining as much of the businesses’ profits as required to maintain the businesses and grow, and

3. Ploughing as much as possible into real-estate, and

4. Keeping a lid on personal spending and maintaining zero-personal (i.e. consumer) debt other than the house [AJC: which, as I mentioned before, we eventually paid off … not that I would recommend this strategy any more … see an upcoming post for more on this].

But, we did pump as much as we could back into the business and bought a number of smaller, residential investment properties (one condo @ bought 2003 for $145k now worth about $300k, one quadruplex bought 2005 for $1 million now worth $1.75 million, and paid off our own home eventually sold for $800k, plus the office building recently sold for $2.5 million).

If you think about it, these are the EXACT SAME STEPS that every PF blogger writes about (debt free, save, reinvest) … I just multiplied the scale and was VERY CLEAR on my cashout $ and time.

But what about my opening comment:

I deliberately chose a provocative title for my blog … whilst partially true, I chose it … well … because it sounded good!

Why only “partially true”?

Well, I did make it to $7 million in the seven years between 1998 and 2005 –  and, by then, my other assets probably had Net Equity of: Business # 1 ($2 million … $1.5 million in cash + whatever value the business could sell for); Home # 1 ($650k); Office ($1.25 million); Residential investments ($1 million).

So, that period sets the scene for our [more than] $7 million 7 year journey, made the good old fashioned way (grow an income stream or two, live frugally within reason, and invest, invest, invest) … and, provides many of the lessons that I had to learn the hard way, but you no longer need to.

But, ‘partially true’ because my journey has an unexpected (but, pleasantly surprising) postscript …

2006 – 2008

I had totally miscalculated the earning potential of my two existing businesses [AJC: actually, three, by then I had started a small training company with a partner, Business # 3]: post year-2000 reengineering, Business # 2 on its own was now capable of producing (and did) $1,000,000 a year net earnings (2006), almost all reinvested in some unexpected new ‘opportunities’:

You see, way back in 2002 I still didn’t know the potential of the new eLogistics-driven business model, yet I still had a $5 million bird to catch …

… so I had already put in train a parallel set of actions that saw me close a deal in 2004 to open two overseas offices (commencing in 2005) – both as ‘no money down’ joint ventures – unfortunately, there went my profits (yet again):

Business # 1 + Business # 2 + Business # 3 + Business # 4 + Business # 5 + Properties # 1 thru’ 4 = Break-Even again!

I was still only taking a $50k salary … my wife still had to work … don’t I EVER get to spend anything??!!

Finally, I sold something: Business # 2 in 2006 for more than 3 times what I was offered in 2002.

… and, the next 3 years sets the scene for an unbelieveable set of negotiations, opportunities, and manoueverings tied to Business # 4 and Business # 5 (which was the reason why we moved to the USA) selling both after only 2 years of operation, more than doubling our net worth again …

… and, funding properties # 4 ($2 mill … paid cash) and # 5 ($4mill. … churned #4 + paid cash) as well as now being able to fund my retirement at age 49.

I kept Business # 1 as well as Business # 5 (although, I soon plan to ‘gift’ my share in that one to my hard-working partner): they both run well and profitably in another country, with separate staff in separate locations, and without me … Michael Gerber taught me how – and why – to do that, too!

But, this period is not the subject of this blog:

Whilst entertaining – and, it might teach you a trick or two about negotiating (I sure as hell learned something!) and/or running a business ‘hands free’ – it hardly counts as Personal Finance, so I might just save the details of that story for ‘the one-day book’ 🙂

How do I figure social security and pension plans into my 'Number'?

In a couple of posts, I have talked about The Number – the amount that you need to have saved (preferably, invested in passive income-producing investments) by the time you retire.

Before we move on, it’s probably time for a quick review of what I mean by ‘retirement date’ because it’s not the same age-related date as most Personal Finance books and blogs assume:

‘Retirement Date’ = The Date YOU Choose to Stop Work!

… This is not 65 or any other age your boss, the government, or society tells you! If you are 35 years old and actually want to retire @ 65 on $1,000,000 a year this is NOT the blog for you!

Now, having got that one off my chest (!), one of my readers, who IS close to the traditional retirement age, asks a great question about how to figure his retirement benefits (which, he will receive as an annuity rather than a lump sum) into The Number for him …

… you can read his original comments here, but this is the essence of his problem:

I am just having trouble trying to quantify my pension so I can include it in my net worth … the trouble is I don’t receive a lump sum, but rather 65% of my base upon retirement, every year, which includes increases for cost of living every year.

The problem is that this reader was trying to find a way to calculate the ‘implied passive asset value’ of this pension into his Net Worth … while you could do that, there’s no real reason to.

If you are in a similar situation, what you really need to know is:

Can I live my ideal retirement on this pension … if not how much extra do I need to count on having in investments by the time I do want to retire?

To do that, we only need to make a slight modification to the formula we have used before.

1. STATE how much you need to live your ‘ideal retirement‘ assuming that you stopped work today (it’s not how much you would have, but how much you would need). What is that number?

2. DOUBLE that amount for every twenty years that you have left until retirement (add 50% if only 10 years, etc.). What is that number?

3. SUBTRACTthe annual value of any social security, annuities, pensions, or other regular amounts that you are reasonably (actually, very) certain to get. What is that number?

4. MULTIPLY your answer by 20 (slightly conservative) to 40 (very conservative). That is The Number … for you!

A couple of points:

I usually ignore Social Security and other government benefits, mainly because governments and regulations change … the longer until your chosen ‘retirement’ the more chance that these things will vaporize before you get there.

Similarly, I work on pre-tax numbers, because I have no idea what the tax regulations will be like …. the longer you have to wait until your chosen ‘retirement date’ the more chance that taxes will change (read: increase) before you get there.

But, these are only rough calcs to get you aiming towards a (probably) larger target than you previously figured on … as you get closer to your planned retirement, you will no doubt have had a number of sessions with a suitably qualified financial adviser who will figure out the exact effects of things like: inflation, taxes, social security.

Now, if you are still a fair way away from retirement (say 10+ years) you may want to figure in the impact of the pension on your Investment Net Worth.

You could multiply your expected yearly retirement benefit, again assuming that you were retiring today, by 20 (this time using the lower number means that you are being extra-conservative) and add this figure to your assumed Investment Net Worth.

You could also add it to your ordinary, garden-variety Net Worth to make 20% Rule decisions regarding how much ‘house’ you can afford.

You could do these things … but, I wouldn’t.

Why?

How certain can you be that you will qualify for any of these things in 10+ years?

What happens if you can’t work, get laid off, your company goes broke or it can’t meet it’s obligations, or … ?

The reason for these ‘rules’ is to ensure that you put your foot on the investment gasnowand, hard!

Don’t use possible future company or government benefits as an excuse to over-spend and under-invest!

By the time you do retire, you’ll be glad that you didn’t …

It's a musical life?

[AJC: Since I wrote this, I notice at least two other blogs posting the same video … oh well, I guess it’s worth another look]

Occasionally, I lapse into the philosophical rather than the purely practical.

For example, I wrote a post fairly recently about the importance of The Journey … money is the result, not the object … yada yada yada.

While true, this Allan Watts video, produced by the South Park Boys (Trey Parker and Matt Stone) says it SO much better … enjoy.

Please!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbvKrH-GC4

AJC.

Most people fail financially, not because their dreams are too big, but because their dreams are TOO SMALL.

How should you plan for your financial future? 

Conventional thinking says to look at your current salary then it says that in retirement you need some larger-or-smaller percentage of that salary to live on – some people say that you need just 50% to 70% of your pre-retirement salary in retirement … others say 100% to 120% – hence you need a certain lump sum invested in a certain way to produce that weekly or monthly withdrawal.

Now, this may produce the RIGHT result for SOME people, but I believe that any resemblance to what MOST PEOPLE would want to retire on is purely coincidental.

Here are two examples – obviously extreme – to illustrate:

1. Less is more

Let’s say that you like surfing … in fact, if to surf every day and just ‘be one with the waves’ is your Life’s Dream, then, I say “go for it!” …

… Go ahead and cash in your 401k and other assets now, move to Byron Bay (Australia) and you can pretty much live the rest of your life on the beach, living off government handouts.

Plenty of people are happily living this ‘dream’ right now …

Requirement: 0% (give or take) of your current salary

2. More is more

In 1998 I had the audacity to imagine a life where I could be ‘free’ to travel physically, mentally, and spiritually … I costed this life in terms of:

(a) Time – I would need to retire within 10 years so that I would be free to travel where and when I liked,

And …

(b) Money – I would need about $250k a year in PASSIVE INCOME, indexed for life … my dream didn’t say that I couldn’t travel Coach!

The only problem, in 1998 I was running a struggling business employing 5 people, losing $5k a month, $30k in debt, drawing only $50k a year, and my wife still had to work … what’s more the business had been running that way for 5 years!

Requirement: 500% (give or take) of my (then) current salary

The outcome for me was positive (I didn’t just pick the name of this blog out of thin air!), I firmly believe BECAUSE I had a Big Dream. My challenge is now to shift from aiming towards it to actually living it.

But, the point here is that your LIFE should dictate your finances, not the other way around … dream first …

… only then, financially plan accordingly.

Add to: | blinklist | del.cio.us | digg | yahoo! | furl | rawsugar | shadows | netvouz

How to avoid being 'house rich' yet 'cash poor' …

I recently read about a very interesting predicament for a reader on Free Money Finance  – one that is, unfortunately, all too common.

 Here is what the reader asked on the post on FMF:

 To start off, my husband and I purchased our home in 1987 for a little over $100,000…..[ her husband died after a whole series of family tragedies]……The house is the only asset I have left and the only thing I have to pass down to our children.

Now, you will need to read the entire post on FMF just to understand the tragedies that this poor woman has had to endure …

…. on top of that, she now has to face an uncertain future because their only form of ‘financial planning’ was to own their own house.

 This is an all-too-common story. In fact, I am reminded of two recent stories from my own family:

1. My wife’s mother died living on a government pension, no vacations, walked wherever she could, and otherwise penny-pinched to survive. Yet she died and left her three daughters (including my wife) a house worth nearly $800k and no mortgage!

2. My 95 y.o. grandmother (still living!) spends all of her income on supporting my mother and two sisters (all capable of working, but choose not to), struggles to pay her own bills (she had to borrow $40,000 from me to pay a Land tax bill). She gave my son a check for his birthday when we went to visit her last Christmas … the check bounced!

However, she just sold an investment property that she had held on to for many, many years (clearly, it became so run down that income was very low) for $4.5 Mill!

Kind of reminds me of the guy who lives like a miser but has a secret $1,000,000 stash of cash stuffed into his mattress.

These are examples of being ‘asset rich’ and ‘cash poor’ and, unfortunately, describes so many Americans reaching retirement age.

The solution is the 20% rule

If you didn’t read the original post, this ‘rule’ says: have no more than 20% of your net worth tied up in your house (plus another 5% max. tied up in cars, furniture and other possessions).

That is simply another way of saying that you must have 75% of your Net Worth in income-producing assets (if you are at or near retirement age) or in a mix of income and growth assets (if you are at least 10 years off retirement).

If you are nowhere near retirement, and this will be your first home purchase … go ahead and break the 20% rule … but, reassess every year and make it your goal to build up enough free equity (that is, more than the 20% rule allows) … when you do, be sure to use that equity to invest or you will end up exactly where this post says you don’t want to be!

Having a house … and only a house … is no way to live.

Add to: | blinklist | del.cio.us | digg | yahoo! | furl | rawsugar | shadows | netvouz

Index Funds or ETF's … you choose …

For those of you trying to ramp up your long-term savings plans, Index Funds and ETF’s offer two great alternatives to CD’s and savings accounts … and a MUCH better alternative than typical Mutual Funds (due to lower costs and similar or even better results).

But, don’t kid yourself, these are savings plans, not Investment plans (there is a difference) …

But, if you are committed to saving rather than investing, you have CHOICES.

Specifically, you can now choose between two very low cost options: Vanguard Index Fund (or similar) or ‘Spider’ ETF (or similar).

There was a great post on The Simple Dollar that I think summarized the differences very neatly:

An ETF is an exchange traded fund … a specific example is the Spider ETF, which matches the S&P 500 in much the same way that the Vanguard 500 does.However, in the end, they’re still not the best deal, as pointed out by this Forbes article.

The Simple Dollar post also talks about what to do while you are saving for your entry fee (unlike a bank, you can’t just plonk down $50 every time you want to buy a few shares in the fund) ….

…. if you are in serious saving mode, why don’t you take a read?

But, why Index Funds or whole-of-market ETF’s in the first place, why not mutual funds?

For answers to these questions, I usually try and go straight to the ‘top’ …

… to the greatest expert in that field that I can find. And, in the field of stock investing there is no better advice than that given by the World’s Greatest Investor himself, Warren Buffet, who once said:

The “know-nothing investor” should both own a large number of equities and space out his purchases. By periodically investing in an index fund, for example, the know-nothing investor can actually out-perform most investment professionals. [W. E. Buffett – 1993]

Who would argue with the World’s Richest Man?

Important Note: 7million7dollars does NOT currently invest in any Index Funds, Mutual Funds, or other “Packaged Investment Products” … apparently, he is just a (rich) product of the Stone Age 😉

Add to: | blinklist | del.cio.us | digg | yahoo! | furl | rawsugar | shadows | netvouz

The WHY leads to the WHEREFORE leads to the MONEY …

… and that’s what makes it all worthwhile!

I’ve been rabbiting on about getting your arms around your Life’s Dream (or Life’s Goal) as a way to understand what your Magic Number is …

… for me, these two concepts made all the difference!

 I just came across this blog post which seems to summarize it nicely …

In it Ian Ybarra says:

I’ve noticed that the more specific goals I have, the wilder the dreams I come up with, the more conscious I am of what I spend my money on. Because committing to doing what I love gives me reason for my money. Every time I’m about to waste money, I can’t help but think “I shouldn’t do this. I could use this money for something I want more.”

I agree with Ian. But, when we talk about Personal Finance, I’ve also noticed that we tend to just talk about money-related goals.

I have a different view – and it’s a view that ultimately made me rich – that money is to support your life, not the other way around!

Buckminster Fuller is generally regarded as one of the twentieth century’s greatest inventors, architects, poets, and visionaries. His theory was that your job/purpose was not to make money. It was to fulfil your life’s purpose … and the money will come (if it’s truly required)!

Precession You

This neat diagram comes from a site that explains some of  Buckminster Fuller’s theories.

I guess, what BF was saying is that our life’s purpose is not necessarily the same as chasing the goal (e.g. to get a promotion or a pay-rise; or to have a $1,000,000 nest egg by age 45; or whatever).

But, the way I look at it is just the opposite …. concentrate all of your efforts on finding then chasing your Life’s True Purpose, and your financial goal – if it is directly related to your life’s purpose – will come!

Precession You 2

So, here is my simple three-step plan for totally turning the traditional way of looking at Personal Finance on it’s head:

1. Find your Life’s Purpose – or at least find what the destination is that you are aiming at and by when (retiring on a beach by 55; quitting the rat race to help the poor in Africa;  reading every book in the library; whatever turns you ON).

2. Work out how much Passive Income you think that you will need to support that lifestyle in today’s dollars … then double that amount for every 25 years (prorate for shorter periods) until the date that you really have planned. If you intend to keep working, just subtract the income that you expect to be able to earn.

3. Multiply by 20: that is the amount that  you will need to have in passive income-producing investments to support your’ Life’s True Purpose Lifestyle by the date that you expect. This becomes your Magic Number.

4. Where will that money come from? it’s probably a larger number (maybe, much larger) than you expected. Right? If so, it will need to come from Making Money 201 strategies … if not, Making Money 101 strategies on their own should achieve your goals.

Please let me know what you think your Magic Number is (and why you need that much/little) …

Be your own President by turning your retirement savings into your very own monthly 'social security' check

I read an interesting post on Free Money Finance – one of my favourite blogs in the ‘Making Money 101’ space – the other day; FMF said:

Here’s an interesting report on the value of Social Security :

The average monthly benefit for retirees is $1,045 in 2007. A 65-year old who wanted to buy a guaranteed income of that size – with payments that go up with the cost of living and continue for a widowed spouse — would need to pay an insurance company about $225,000.

Firstly, if you are rubbing your hands and thinking “I need to save $225k LESS” for my retirement now, you have rocks in your head!

Why?

Relying on a government hand out is always bad advice … as the population ages there will HAVE to be changes in Social Security – none of them good … for you!

My advice is simple: PLAN to go without, GRATEFULLY ACCEPT what you are given.

But, there is an even more interesting lesson to be learned here:

The government is prepared to pay you 2% of that ‘invisible’ $225,000 that they have effectively put aside for you, each year … and INCREASE it each year to keep up with the cost of living … nice.

 How would you like to be able to set up your own plan that works exactly the same way?

 There is a way!

It’s safe … it’s legal … and, it’s easy … and it’s all covered in this book by a highly respected professor.

Here’s what you do …

 You invest your lump sum at (or before) retirement in special inflation-proof government bonds called TIPS.

TIPS are as safe as Social Security because they are US Federal Government Treasury Bonds … the difference is that you put up your own money so, unlike Social Security, the government can NEVER get out of it’s obligation to:

a) Pay you back your Principal (the amount you put in) plus the value of inflation! And,

b) Pay you a 6-monthly dividend (call it your ‘social security check’) also adjusted for inflation each year.

This is not financial advice, as you will need to see your own financial adviser to determine:

1. If this strategy can work for you;

2. How much to expect in bond interest each year; and,

3. Whether you should substitute inflation-protected MUNI’s for the TIP’s that the author recommends … useful if you are investing outside of a tax-shelter (e.g. ROTH IRA).

Let me know what you think?

Making Money 301 – Staying Rich

Very few people will ‘become rich’ …

… a lot of those that do make it to this stage do so by virtue of ‘accident’ (inheritence, lottery, sudden fame, etc.) … without graduating through Money 101 and 201, many lose their money here … all of it and quickly.

During this stage, there is still an up to 80% failure rate!

Even for those who have lived through Money 201 and 301, the rules change (again). There are only a couple of books (Get Rich, Stay Rich, Pass It OnThe Millionaire Next Door, and Donald Trump’s books) and I didn’t find any of them to be terribly helpful.

This stage is all about moving more risky ACTIVE assets (businesses, trading portfolios, etc.) into PASSIVE portfolios (income producing real estate, selected value stocks, inflation-protected bonds, etc.) that generate enough passive income to support your dream retirement lifestyle.

The tools here are wealth preservation tools: value stocks, buy-and-hold commercial real estate, inflation-protected bonds (as well as maintaining the remaining Money 101 and 201 systems).

Now that you are Rich (really), your main task is to have fun (you’ve earned it!) but to also be at least 98% certain that your money will not run out before you do

Simple, isn’t it?

Do you know how much you will retire on?

If you are like most Americans, the chances are that you have virtually no idea how much you will be able to retire on …

In fact, only 1 in 3 do. And, everybody else in the world is pretty clueless, too … at least according to this AXA survey:

Do you know how much you will retire on?

It gets worse, of those who do know (or think they know) how much they will retire on almost half don’t think it will be enough:

Retirement Shortfall

… and, I bet that 90% of the other half are simply settling for a LOT LESS than their dream retirement.

Don’t let that be you … start by working out your Number, and let’s go from there …