This goes back to a comment that I received in response to a question posted on another finance blog - one that I happen to like for early-stage savers …
I suggested that for many people, their retirement savings actually won’t be enough to fund their ideal retirement … if they’re happy to accept less, fine!
If not, then I suggested that they may need to do something a bit more active to pick up the pace …
Here is a response that I received:
“Your investing approach of “actively (business, real estate, trading)” sounds more like speculating and your savings approach (CDs, 401ks, etc.)” sounds more like investing to me. Just based on the statistics of individuals who trade rather than index…most get eaten up by fees while compounding growth usually is the better way to go using monte carlo analysis, But who knows what will happen in the future.
IF your retirement plan is on track, then keep doing what you’re doing.
But, the vast majority of people can’t simply SAVE themselves into their ideal retirement; they have to INVEST in their future.
I call it ‘investing’ – investing in our future – but, if starting a part-time, work-at-home business, experimenting with actively trading stocks or options [not my personal choice], renovating then holding an income-producing property, etc. is ‘speculation’ to you …
… I simply say:
Bring it on baby!
One Response to “
Let's not confuse 'saving' with 'investing' … ”
about me I made $7 million in 7 years™ … but, I started out $30,000 in debt.
Now, find out how you can get rich(er) quick(er) ... no scams, no schemes ... just good old fashioned financial advice!
[...] don’t kid yourself, these are savings plans, not Investment plans (there is a difference) [...]