I'm about to find out if you can make money online – Part V

I spent most of yesterday’s post talking about starting businesses (for College-age kids, but it’s a great way to go for anybody looking to start something low-cost and part-time) … so, it’s time to update my occasional series on starting an on-line business!

But, we’ve tried the scams and ignored the schemes and so far haven’t yet found an “off the shelf” way to make money online.

So, now it’s time to try Plan B: create my own Information Product.

My plan is to take some of the information that I have already published on this blog and my other one and turn it into an e-book. The purpose isn’t to make money for me … it’s to show you how you can make money online.

So, I will ‘open up the books’ here [AJC: if I can find an easy web-based tool for accounting that let’s me publish reports, I will literally ‘open up the books’ so that you can see how it works out, financially … let me know if you know of one?] …

Why Information Publishing?

Well, it lets me do something that I won’t do on my blogs: turn stuff that I know into stuff that I can sell … and, it allows me to sell all sorts of affiliate stuff (so, all the referrals that I make to various books and other useful products on this site, without any financial benefit to myself, can be sold WITH affiliate commissions on the new site).

Again, for your benefit. How?

Because you can think of some area where you are (or can quickly become) an ‘expert’ and follow in my foot-steps … assuming that my site produces a useful income. That’s the purpose of this test!

So, as I write this post I am literally sitting down having this morning hit on the concept for a commercial version of my blogs, and am looking for the ‘right’ way to implement it.

For this, I have decided first to try out Derek Gehl’s new product, BeBiz – supposedly a way to create an sales-oriented internet site pretty quickly … since I don’t yet have the product (I am thinking an eBook to start with) or the means to create my own web-site from scratch, I am hoping that this product will lead me ‘by the hand’ as this product demo [AJC: which I have just paused to write this comment, and which I am about to continue watchingbefore typing and more] promises.

We shall see …

[AJC: Rather than fill this blog with more posts on this subject, I just created a brand new blog – yes, AJC is officially an idiot … instead of sitting back in his hammock, drinking pina coladas like he’s supposed to be doing now that he’s fully and healthily/wealthily retired at 49 years old, he wants to create yet another blog to fill in his time! I hope to use this blog to chronicle how to start an easy – well, I hope it will be easy – web-site that actually makes enough money to make it worth while for somebody like you … and, I plan to do that one in ‘real time’ i.e. write posts as I do stuff on that blog]

Start the next Facebook?

Alex asks:

I think I have a fairly solid financial intelligence, although I am always on the lookout for learning new information on stocks, and real estate and the like. When I was a sophomore in high school I spent my saved money on stocks instead of a car like everyone else. But what I want to know, is how to START. It seems like you need money to make money, but right now I am just about to begin college, and while I have no intention whatsoever of spending my life (especially my youthful 22-40 years) working, right now I don’t have the money to buy real estate and begin to build an income generating property portfolio. In four years when I graduate, I will have no college loan debt, but I don’t want to “enter the workforce” because I will never get rich working for someone else. Do you think its possible to do something like 2 million in 4 years, so that when I graduate I will have enough money to use to make more money with? And if so, how do I start that now? I currently have about $16,000 in stocks.

So Alex wants to go from $16k to $2 Million in 4 years …

… as I pointed out to him, that’s a 400% compounded return. The stock market averages 12%; Warren Buffett averages 26%

But, I did point Alex to two places that can return 400% or even more: the lottery and business. I humbly suggested that he start the next Facebook.

Alex responded:

Well maybe I was too hasty in throwing out the figure 2 million. I guess what i really mean is how do I build up a large enough sum of money to actually begin making money with? All of your “money making 101″ strategies seem to already require a sizable pile of money with which to begin implementing them. Also, the real estate strategy of building up passive income through rents is an extremely long term one. If I were to buy a $160,000 dollar house at 6% with about 30,000 down (assuming my 16k turned into 30k during my college years), my mortgage would be around 720 a month. Realistically, I could probably rent that property for about 1100 a month. So we are only talking about somewhere around $3600 per year. Its a strategy that takes over 25 years to really begin producing enough passive income to support just a modest, middle class lifestyle.

Now, I’ll let you in on a little secret, and the younger you are – College age is ideal – the better this works:

Skip Making Money 101.

There, I said it: don’t worry about all the save 15% of your salary stuff; all the pay down debt stuff; all the diversify into Index Funds stuff …

… simply forget all the personal finance blogs, altogether.

Jump straight to Making Money 201.

Start a business – the internet is ideal – because I can’t think of any other legal way to give you a shot at making millions … and, it’s clearly possible because others have done it.

But, wait … surely you can’t expect to create the next Facebook?!

No, you can’t … but, you won’t need to: you only need to focus on making as much money (income) as you reasonably can – while still concentrating on getting good College grades.

Here’s the SECRET:

While you are making oodles and oodles of cash (well, at least a few extra bucks), you don’t spend it … in fact, you don’t even tell anyone that you have it. Your business could be generating an extra $100 a week, $1,000 a week, or even $10,000 a week and you still don’t tell anybody.

Why?

Because your secrecy lets you keep living like a penniless college kid, mooching off family and friends like any ‘normal’ college kid does, while you’re busy investing 99% of what you earn.

Will this work?

Maybe … but, if you flame and burn [AJC: did I forget to mention this was high risk / high reward 🙂 ], so what?

As long as you’ve been careful to avoid accumulating personal debt, you’re still just as poor as your buddies; you learned a lot; and, you had a helluva ride …

… one that you would never had been able to take if you actually needed Making Money 101 😉

That’s why you take risks when you are young, before you are saddled with debt, commitments, and angst.

I think I’ve been confused …

LuckyInvestor has been busy building a kind of reference manual / index to our ‘grand experiment’ at 7m7y.com … take a look and let him know what you think (what is he missing? what’s in/out of place? suggestions?) … the only reason why I won’t directly support the site is that I am not sure where it is going and I cannot control if he eventually puts in advertising, which is against my principles for this program (but, he is welcome to) … so, any help that you can / want to give him … check this out: http://luckyinvestormn.blogspot.com/

Now, on with today’s post ….

______________________________________

If you think you’re confused, then you really are confused!

This seems to be Ethel’s dilemma, one that we inadvertently uncovered when she wrote me an e-mail (on Networth IQ) asking for help on transitioning from Making Money 101 to Making Money 201.

After reading my answer to her original problem Ethel left a long – and critically important – comment, saying:

“However, I feel that my audience wants more … they have a ‘big dream’ … they want it now (well, soon’ish) … and it requires fuel – lots of it (money!) – and lots of free time, to boot!”

I think this *is* me, but the issue is that I haven’t defined my dream. It isn’t the standard, “Retire at age X and live like a king” style of dream – I’m happy with a modest lifestyle. But I want to have (a) time to volunteer and (b) money to support others in volunteer and charitable work, and I want to change the world through this work.

I think I’ve been confused by all the focus on retirement (like in your magic number article). Retirement is exceedingly easy for me; I could probably have everything I need in a 401(k) and IRA by the end of a couple of years, let it sit for 30 years, and be done with retirement planning.

What I should have been defining is how I want to change the world BEFORE then, how much time this will take, how much money this will take, how much I can earn mid-dream, when I want to do it, and if I will have time after this to get all the resources for the rest of my life (retirement), or if I will need to start getting ready for retirement now as well.

So . . . when I start thinking this way, I see that most of my dreams are best accomplished in my 30s and 40s, maybe early 50’s. That’s where I’ve been messing up. I should worry less about retirement, which is a low-resource period when I dream about my life. I should worry more about ages 30 to 45, when I want to accomplish my biggest, most time-and-money intensive dreams. I don’t intend to be retired during this time, but I would like to cut back my hours at work so I can give time as well as money, and so I can spend more time with my husband and children.

The trick for us is that we are essentially just starting out. So I need to go from just over $0 to (magic number for my mid-life dreams) in 5 years. This isn’t too scary, since I will be earning during mid-life still – just not as much. But it is still ambitious – and when I reduce hours at my job, I will need either fewer expenses, or a passive income / savings to cover the gap between expenses and job income.

Thanks, you’ve helped a lot by making me question if I should even be trying to get rich(er) quick(er). Yes, I should – but now I know what I need to know to figure out how much money, how fast. My magic number is just going to take a little more work to figure out, since it’s not just “get here and then stop active earning”.

I’m glad that Ethel asked the question on NWiQ and gave me the opportunity to respond here, because she has summarized very neatly in this comment what I have obviously so far failed to make clear on this blog.

And, that is:

Retirement is not some nebulous date in 30 years when society ‘norms’ say that it’s time to stop working …

… it’s when you need to stop preparing to live and actually start living!

You ‘magic number’ is not merely a number ….

… it’s a DATE.

A date when you need to stop working (or, at least stop working as hard) to concentrate on LIVING your Life’s Purpose.

Is real-estate management time consuming?

Rick asks:

What about time commitment? What is a realistic estimate of hrs/year needed to manage a single rental property?

Well, I can only tell you what we do: we only have one property that qualifies as a ‘single rental property’, one little condo in a complex of about 16 units that we do not own, near the beach …

…. and, while we live in the USA, that beach is in Melbourne, Australia!

Also, it’s my wife who manages this one, so I asked her:

It takes about 2 hours per year.

Now, we have another residential property that is a quadruplex; it’s also in Australia and my accountant takes care of that one while we are in the USA.

I checked and it takes him less than 2 hours per month … at least, that’s what he bills me for, so the whole thing probably also takes him about 2 hours per year!

The secret?

Simple: we always hire property managers and get them to take care of everything:

1. Finding tenants

2. Negotiating leases

3. Handling repairs and maintenance

4. Collecting the rents

5. Paying the bills

Doesn’t it cost money?

Sure. 6% – 9% of the rental income (plus usually the first month’s rent for any replacement tenancy after a tenant leaves).

Would it be cheaper doing it ourselves? Of course: we could ‘pay ourselves’ that 6% to 9%, but then:

1. We would eventually suffer burnout. It can be very stressful handling retail tenants.

2. We would be trading (our) time for money.

Trading time for money is exactly the wrong way of looking at it: time is a finite resource; money is an infinite resource, why trade the finite one for the infinite one?

In other words, they keep printing money, but nobody is giving away more time.

So, every time that I can find an opportunity to ‘buy’ time with my money that’s exactly what I will do.

It’s why I give my shirts to the dry cleaners; my mowing to the landscapers; and my property management to the experts. It’s why I outsource practically everything to do with my investments, too – except picking the investments themselves, or managing any issues to do with risk.

If I didn’t outsource my property management, I would eventually stop buying real-estate because every property that I bought would add to my workload, and who wants to do anything that makes you have to work harder? And, I would eventually get what Dave Lindahl calls “tenant burnout” …

So, I may lower my return on each property somewhat, but I reinvest the ‘saved time’ into purchasing more investments … the whole shebang is much greater than the parts.

Newsletters. Worth the 'paper' they are written on?

Ryan asks:

I’d like your opinion on investment newsletters such as those offered by the guys over at Tycoon Research. Is it possible to use this in your money making 201 phase. At the moment I’m still in making money 101 but I can’t shake the idea of leveraging someone else’s knowledge to make you money. Of course, as with all things, you should know enough not to be taken for ride.

This is a really easy one!

Does Warren Buffet:

a. Write about his stock picks and earn a fixed fee for each one that he publishes?

b. Invest in his stock picks on behalf of his customers and take a 1% ‘cut’ on the money invested?

c. Invest in his stock picks on his behalf (and, on behalf of the other shareholders in his own company)?

Let’s see:

a. Might produce $100k – $1 million per year revenue, depending on how many subscribers you can get.

b. Might produce $1 million – $100 million per year revenue, depending upon how much money you can get under your management.

c. Well, how much did we say Warren Buffett is worth?

Newsletter publishers are on the bottom of the wealth totem-pole, so I would give their ideas about as much credence as I would give to anybody who makes their daily living by giving you information.

I would only take my information from somebody who has already made 10 times as I want to make from doing the exact thing that I want to do …

… so, if you can find a newsletter publisher who fits that criteria (and, I’m sure they’re out there, for the same reasons that I’m here), then go for it!

Otherwise, you’re going to have to learn how to do research (BTW: much of what I’ve seen in the Tycoon Report that you mention falls into the ‘how’ category … I read it!), then do it yourself …

If it’s stocks that you’re interested in, you could do worse than start by reading Rule # 1 Investing by Phil Town.

According to this, I'm financially dead!

I came across this financial health check on an Australian government web-site, and I must admit that the test itself is sound  and you should try it NOW at this link before reading on …

dum di dum di dum [waiting music]

Finished already? It’s a quick one …

… did you see how it provided useful links to basic Making Money 101 reading material for any question where you may not have selected the ‘best’ answer? Nice, huh?

But, if you’re an avid follower of Personal Finance books and blogs, the answers may have seemed a little obvious … and, you may have even disagreed with a couple.

Let’s see:

As you know by now, my purpose for sharing this type of basic PF ‘wisdom’ on this site is to show you exactly why so-called conventional wisdom fails because it is almost always designed to deliver a conventional result … but, we aren’t satisfied with merely achieving conventional results, are we?!

So, here is the test – reproduced, with the most obvious answer bolded (I haven’t checked the test results to see if they agree … these just seem the most obvious answers to me) – but, I didn’t say it was the ‘right’ answer 🙂

I have added my comments underneath each question:

1    Do you save any of your money?
a) Yes. I try to put some aside for bills.
b) Yes. I keep a bit back from each pay because I am saving for something I want.
c) Of course I save, to pay for bills, to buy things I want, for a rainy day and for my retirement.
d) It would be nice to have enough left to save.

For me, the answer was None of The Above: since I have transitioned (almost) from Making Money 201 to Making Money 301, it is calculating the correct amount of ‘safe monthly withdrawal’ from my ‘nest egg’ that determines that I have enough for bills, to buy things, and for a ‘rainy day’, as I am already retired. Unfortunately, if you don’t do this calculation well (in my case, 7 years, but for most people 10 to 20 years) before your expected retirement, your nest egg simply won’t be enough to support your intended lifestyle.

2    Do you keep track of your money?
a) No, I have a life.
b) My bank statements help me do this.
c) I have a rough idea of where my money goes and where it comes from.
d) I have a budget plan.

I have a confession to make: I have NEVER kept track of my money. This is a fault but, contrary to conventional financial wisdom, actually not wealth threatening unless, one of the potential disasters (that  will point out in a future) post does occur. So, while conventional wisdom says to have a detailed budget plan that you should stick to, I have found that when I was ‘poor’ and when I was ‘rich’ a “rough idea of where my money goes and where it comes from” is sufficient.

3    How much do you pay towards your credit card accounts each month?
a) As much as I can.
b) I can’t always make the payments and sometimes use one credit card to pay off another.
c) The minimum amount.
d) I only borrow money for something I really need and when I am sure I can keep up the              payments.

The answer here, for me and for everybody, should be None of the Above: if you cannot pay your credit card balance off IN FULL each and every month, don’t use it. That was our policy through financial ‘thick and thin’ and it should work for you. As for borrowing to buy ‘stuff’ … don’t! I remember that we took ‘advantage’ of an interest-free purchase once …. it was a pain in the rear-end to keep up with the payments (they want you to, so that they can kick in the ‘fine print’ excessive interest payments) and we didn’t do it again … neither should you.

4    What would you do with a windfall?
a) Pay off my bills and put some money towards my loans.
b) Buy something I really need.
c) Save it.
d) Spend it.

The answer here is both All of the Above and None of the Above and deserves its own post; but, for now: Reserve whatever your accountant says that you need to pay any taxes on the windfall; then take 5% to 10% of what’s left and spend it like a crazy gorilla (go ahead … don’t be a miser); then if you owe money (on consumer loans), pay those down until there’s either no loan left or no windfall left (there are exceptions); then put aside 50% of the balance for investments; then pay cash for something that you really need (do you REALLY need that car? If so, go ahead and buy it!); then invest whatever is left. Notice that this only makes sense if you do it in this exact order 🙂

5    If you were in the market for a new car and loan what would you do?
a) Shop around for the best deal for both the car and the loan.
b) Take advice from a friend or family member.
c) Find a car I like and get the finance wherever I can.

None of the above: In ANY stage of my financial life I’d pay cash for less car than I want. Period.

6    Will you have enough money when you retire?
a) I am far too young to worry about this.
b) I have superannuation and I am pretty sure I’ll have enough when I retire.
c) I have made sure that I’ve got a plan and I know I’ll have enough when I retire.

Of course the answer is c) and we have the plan all laid out for you (the exact, same planning process that I followed) on http://7m7y.com … find it, read it, do it!

7    Would you be protected if your house burnt down?
a) I don’t know if I’m insured or not.
b) I am fully insured.
c) I have some insurance but I am not quite sure what is covered or the level of that cover.

Of course, your answer must be b), but, when you have enough money, why pay somebody else to carry the risk for you? So, while I was on my journey I carried a sh*t-load of insurance, including millions of dollars in life/trauma cover. Now, I carry a $20k deductible on my contents cover; full house/building insurance (a $1 mill. house fire would hurt at little); no personal life/trauma insurance – we do carry health insurance because with a young family we don’t know what will come up and it saves us carrying large chunks of cash … but, we could just as easily ‘self-insure’ this, too.

8    If you received a large bill for car repairs how would you pay for it?
a) Withdraw the money from my savings or take out a loan and work out the best way of paying it back.
b) With my credit card and pay it back sometime.
c) From a special account I keep for emergencies.

For me, the answer is always b) – plonk it on my credit card then pay the bill in full when it comes up … we always have enough cash on hand (not as an emergency fund) because it’s hard to be always fully-invested (in the current market, having cash on hand IS an investment!). My thinking for you, though, differs from the conventional answer that is bolded: I think the correct answer is a) and have already posted on this.

9    What would you do if you received a phone call offering you a chance to make big money with a new investment opportunity?
a) Take up the offer, no one becomes rich without taking risks.
b) Consider it carefully and seek qualified advice.
c) Ignore it. It is unlikely that anyone would make such a good offer unless there is a catch.

I think that most people would say b) but I think that the people who created this questionnaire agree with me that c) is the correct answer: by the time you see, read, hear, are told about, given a hot tip on, read in the tea-leaves, had a vision about ANY investment, it’s already too late for YOU to make money on it! Sorry, that’s just the way it works …

10    If you lost your partner are you sure your family would be OK financially?
a) My partner is too young for me to worry about this.
b) They will be OK as I have ensured that our finances are in order.

OR
c) I am reasonably sure they will be OK as I have some insurance.

For most people the answer is a combination of b) and c) … from the way the question is written, b) is the ‘obvious’ answer, though. The only correct answer is b), though, as insurance becomes less and less important as you build up your own financial reserves … until you reach that point, insurance is really PART of making sure that your ‘finances are in order’ anyway.

Did you find it as interesting as I did that in many cases the ‘correct’ answer wasn’t even one of the options provided?

If you also noticed this – while you were doing the ‘test’ for yourself, and before I pointed it out – then you have a real chance to be an ‘unconventional financial success’, too 🙂

Just make a move!

I wrote a piece about the 80/20 rule: how 80% of the people do nothing. I then broke the remaining 20% who do ‘something’ into two sub-groups:

– The 19% who save, pay down debt, etc.

– The 1% who will strive for – and perhaps reach – the top of the financial totem-pole.

And, I believe that the difference between all of these groups boils down to one thing: propensity to take action.

Josh‘s question sums it up quite nicely:

I guess you don’t want to be one of those people who contract “paralysis by analysis”. I’m thinking the key here is to just make a move, even though it may not be most perfect move?

Most people fail because they either take too much action or not enough!

Too much action can be a problem, for example, when you chase the market and switch investments a lot; as the Dalbar study found:

During the greatest bull market of all time from 1984 to December 2002 the study came up with an annualized return of 2.57% [for market timers, who move in/out of investments chasing better returns] compared to 12.22% for those who bought and held an S&P500 index fund.

But, how much did those who took NO action make?

0%

Clearly, taking some action is preferable to none … but, what of Josh’s second point: taking action even if “it may not be most perfect move”?

Life rarely presents us with a Final Choice Option …

…. when we take an action, we are usually free to take another! If you make a mistake, back-out as best you can and try something else.

I think of life in terms of a branching structure: at many stages – every day, hour, minute – we are standing at some sort of fork in the road and we have to take the left branch or the right. Somehow, we find a way to choose one:

a) If it seems to carry us to where we want to go. Fine. We stick with it (at least for a while).

b) If it seems to carry us away from where we want to go, we simply wait for the next branching opportunity and try something different.

For example, if an investment works we (should) stick with it. If not, we can always exit for a (hopefully) small’ish loss and try another … if we don’t the loss might increase and take us to zero (how about Enron?).

Of course, this is where it helps to have an overall destination in mind; it helps us understand what does represent the ‘right direction’ for each of us: sometimes, more than one branch appears to be sensible.

But, if you have a clear idea of your Life’s Purpose, all of a sudden only one of the branches may start to make more sense than another.

This helps to explain: where your Life’s Purpose goes, your finances will eventually and surely follow … either by direct route, or meandering, you will eventually find the road to what you deem to be success.

To each their own …

You’ve heard about the so-called Debt Free Revolution?

Suze Orman and Dave Ramsey are the most famous proponents of the pay-down-all-debt approach to personal finance.

But, just because something is called a ‘revolution’ doesn’t necessarily make it right!

… I’m sure that plenty of good French aristocrats also lost their heads during the French Revolution!

But, Money Monk was just voicing the view that’s it’s OK for debt-averse people, or those who know nothing about investing, to pay off their mortgages early when he said:

To each their own. In my parents case it was wise for them to pay off their mortgage because they have no knowledge of stocks and investments.

In my case it maybe be wise not to pay off my mortgage. Some people just like the simple no risk life. Younger people tend to take more risk because time is on their side.

Unless more people are educated about the market, many will go the debt free route because it take no risk

Firstly, if your parents were born in the US, MoneyMonk, they didn’t want a mortgage because they (or their parents) saw how the banks pulled mortgages to try and fund the run against their cash deposits during the Great Depression.

Their view was simple: “if I don’t have a mortgage, then the Bank can’t take my house away”.

But, this can’t happen any more. The bank can’t take your house away if you continue to make payments on time …

Secondly, having no knowledge of “stocks and investments” is no excuse: you can get that knowledge … even if it was a valid ‘excuse’ for your parents, it certainly isn’t the case today. Blogs such as your and mine are just one example about the sources of information out there today …

But, I agree: if time is running out, and you have less than 10 years left to retirement, then it’s probably too late – and too risky – to change course. The volatility of just about any investment over a time frame of a decade or less makes them simply too risky to bet your financial future on.

But, if you do have time on your side, then the risk is totally on the side of NOT investing. Because not investing guarantees a poor financial outcome!

And, if any of my readers think that getting a 6.5% – 8.5% after-tax return is ‘investing’ then they should be reading Pensioners’ Weakly instead of this blog 🙂

A great question for the few …

Today, I have a treat for you …

… it will save you from going broke when you are on the cusp of success, so print this off and keep it somewhere safe!

It came about because of a great question from somebody who is (or should be) gearing up to move from Making Money 201 (increasing your income) to Making Money 301 (maintaining your wealth) …

… it comes from Donovan who asked this question by way of a comment on this post – appropriately about the ‘myth of income’:

My questions is, if my income is roughly $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 a year and I have no debt other than two small car loans. How much house can I afford?

I told Donovan “super-high-income can be a curse – not the blessing that the rest of the world imagines it to be”.

Now, tell me in your heart of hearts – if you are not already on a super-high income ($500k++) can you imagine what the problem/s might be?

Sure you can: too many girl/boy friends; too many cars and houses; cirrhosis of the liver 😉

On the serious side, these ‘excesses’ point to the real issue: living beyond our means is an even bigger problem for those on super-high-incomes than for those on ordinary incomes … really.

Here’s why …

You may be saving $200,000 (pre-tax) of your, say, $1,000,000 gross annual income … that’s 20% – a respectable percentage and huge dollar amount in anybody’s language.

But, that’s not the problem … it’s the $400k that you spend (after you pay Uncle Sam his ‘dues’) that is …

… the problem is this:

How ‘well off’ will you be when the income stops as it surely will (one day)?

If you don’t believe that this could be a problem: recall MC Hammer.

If not MC (who went from multi-millionaire to broke), then how about Elton John (nearly … he recovered financially) and many other sports stars who fell out of contract (or retired) or celebrities who time/circumstance took from A-List to C-List to …

Or how about the 4 out of 5 major lottery winners who are financially worse off 5 years after winning the lottery?

Here is the problem in a nutshell: living off your ENTIRE current income when it is likely (or even just possible) that it may not continue for ever.

If you are lucky enough to dramatically increase your income (and, if you follow my Making Money 201 strategies, you surely will), here is how you need to start thinking:

Income of any amount – and the more your earn, the more appropriate is what I am about to tell you – is the ‘fuel’ that builds your Investment Net Worth

… your Investment Net Worth is like a (one day huge … if you follow the 7million7year strategy) battery that you are trickle-charging or fast-charging with your income.

The amount available to charge your battery is purely based upon what you DON’T spend from that income today.

For example, when I was earning $1,000,000+ from my businesses, I still took home a miserly $50,000 a year (plus cars, business trips, and other legal ‘perks’) and diverted the balance to ‘fast-charging’ my ‘battery’.

My battery consisted mainly of income-producing real-estate investments (plus some stocks).

What you can happily spend should tend towards what your battery can generate when it is unplugged from the mains (i.e. your income) …

That way, when your income stops, your battery can kick in like an Uninterruptible Money Supply, and you never need to take a decrease in your standard of living (a very difficult and humbling experience that I urge you to avoid).

I like the battery analogy, but I prefer a ‘perpetual motion’ battery which cannot exist in physics; but, here’s how it can work financially:

– You build up the charge in your battery as fast as your Income LESS Spending can make it happen. Can you see how you have two levers here: 1. Increase your Income, and 2. Spend less … also, a third lever 3. Increase your battery’s efficiency (i.e. increase your investment returns?

– Once your battery is fully charged (this is entirely up to what YOU consider to be ‘fully charged’) you can cut over to battery power … hopefully, this comes at a time and with an amount that suits you … if so, congratulations, you are retired!

– Just remember, that when you are on battery power, you have two forces that are serving to drain the battery (your retirement living expenses, and inflation) and only one force serving to keep it topped up (investment returns), so you need a MUCH LARGER BATTERY than you may, at first think.

So, when figuring how much of your $1,000,000 – $2,000,000 yearly income to spend, Donovan, think about this:

– Do you ever want to spend LESS in your life than you do now? You are a fool or a saint if you think you can.

– Multiply the amount that you WANT to spend per year NOW by 20 (or 40 if you are as conservative as me), and that is how much you must have in your battery if you were to retire TODAY on your current income.

– Double your battery size for every 20 years between NOW and when you DO want to retire (to allow for the trickle drain of just 4% inflation).

This simple three step process answers a very important question for our Super-High-Income (indeed, ANY income friends) …

… if the battery is too large for you to every conceive getting, simply lower your current spending wants until you come up with a number (and, a timeframe) that does seem to work. The good news is that as you lower your current spending, you can divert more to charging your battery!

How has this worked out for me?

Very well indeed, but you might be surprised to hear that I COULD live off much more than I do, but I also like the concept of keeping some of my battery power in reserve against unforeseen circumstances …

… after all, if you were relying on just battery ‘power’ for the rest of your life, wouldn’t you want to at least keep some in reserve? 🙂