<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking the Myth of Replacement Income</title>
	<atom:link href="http://7million7years.com/2008/10/14/debunking-the-myth-of-replacement-income/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/10/14/debunking-the-myth-of-replacement-income/</link>
	<description>How to make 7 million in 7 years ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/10/14/debunking-the-myth-of-replacement-income/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>@AJ - I learn something new every time I visit one of your sites.

Consumption smoothing applied twice as you described could be an effective way to incorporate Scott&#039;s ideas into your &quot;Number&quot; approach.

If you get a copy of ESPlanner and it works well, I&#039;d love to hear your thoughts on its value as a planning tool.  I&#039;m especially intrigued with the &quot;Plus&quot; version that incorporates a Monte Carlo analysis.

All I&#039;ve been able to find so far appears to be the standard review stuff companies put out to promote their product.

Jeff
Learn to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindingmyownbusiness.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;manage money&lt;/a&gt; and mind your own business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AJ &#8211; I learn something new every time I visit one of your sites.</p>
<p>Consumption smoothing applied twice as you described could be an effective way to incorporate Scott&#8217;s ideas into your &#8220;Number&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>If you get a copy of ESPlanner and it works well, I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts on its value as a planning tool.  I&#8217;m especially intrigued with the &#8220;Plus&#8221; version that incorporates a Monte Carlo analysis.</p>
<p>All I&#8217;ve been able to find so far appears to be the standard review stuff companies put out to promote their product.</p>
<p>Jeff<br />
Learn to <a href="http://www.mindingmyownbusiness.net" rel="nofollow">manage money</a> and mind your own business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJC</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/10/14/debunking-the-myth-of-replacement-income/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>AJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>@ Jeff - I am going to write a post about the Power of Follow-Up: the publishers contacted me to review the book and sent me a copy; I said it&#039;s useless without a trial version of the s/w which they promised, but still haven&#039;t sent me!

Like most subjects written by technicians, this book focuses on the fine tuning: I suspect, that the s/w could help to improve my strategy by running it TWICE:

Once pre-achieving your Number to smooth your lifestyle and help ensure you reach the target, THEN

Again post-achieving your Number to smooth your NEW lifestyle through retirement.

But, without the s/w, I cannot test this to make the appropriate recommendation/s :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jeff &#8211; I am going to write a post about the Power of Follow-Up: the publishers contacted me to review the book and sent me a copy; I said it&#8217;s useless without a trial version of the s/w which they promised, but still haven&#8217;t sent me!</p>
<p>Like most subjects written by technicians, this book focuses on the fine tuning: I suspect, that the s/w could help to improve my strategy by running it TWICE:</p>
<p>Once pre-achieving your Number to smooth your lifestyle and help ensure you reach the target, THEN</p>
<p>Again post-achieving your Number to smooth your NEW lifestyle through retirement.</p>
<p>But, without the s/w, I cannot test this to make the appropriate recommendation/s <img src='http://7million7years.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/10/14/debunking-the-myth-of-replacement-income/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>AJC - Thanks for the shout out! :-)

I don&#039;t know if you had a chance to finish Scott Burns and Larry Kotlikoff&#039;s book &quot;Spend &#039;Til the End&quot; but they make a very similar point about the inaccuracy that often occurs when making your financial plans centered upon spending targets (e.g. 80% of pre-retirement income).

One big difference in their philosophy from yours is that thiers will give you a smooth life.  One that is similar today and in retirement.

I like your approach better.  I want something much more than today and much earlier than when I&#039;m 65.

Keep up the great work
Jeff

Learn to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindingmyownbusiness.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;manage money&lt;/a&gt; and mind your own business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJC &#8211; Thanks for the shout out! <img src='http://7million7years.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you had a chance to finish Scott Burns and Larry Kotlikoff&#8217;s book &#8220;Spend &#8216;Til the End&#8221; but they make a very similar point about the inaccuracy that often occurs when making your financial plans centered upon spending targets (e.g. 80% of pre-retirement income).</p>
<p>One big difference in their philosophy from yours is that thiers will give you a smooth life.  One that is similar today and in retirement.</p>
<p>I like your approach better.  I want something much more than today and much earlier than when I&#8217;m 65.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work<br />
Jeff</p>
<p>Learn to <a href="http://www.mindingmyownbusiness.net" rel="nofollow">manage money</a> and mind your own business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

