<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Millionaire by 30?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/</link>
	<description>How to make 7 million in 7 years ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJC</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>AJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=197#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>@ Dana - Your first two para&#039;s are literally &#039;right on the money&#039;. Last para spot on, too! However, I differ on the emergency fund issue slightly and have a post coming up on just that subject ... stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dana &#8211; Your first two para&#8217;s are literally &#8216;right on the money&#8217;. Last para spot on, too! However, I differ on the emergency fund issue slightly and have a post coming up on just that subject &#8230; stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=197#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Oh, and:  You don&#039;t have to be in a situation where prices will go up to make money in real estate.  With the subprime meltdown and all the foreclosures going on, the market is hurting for affordable and decent rental properties that people can live in while they are recovering financially.  I don&#039;t know why more prospective real estate investors don&#039;t consider landlording.  OK, I know it&#039;s kind of a pain in the you-know-where, but you know, you have to deal with people in your daily life anyway.  You might as well be making a check from some of them that isn&#039;t tied to your job.  And you&#039;ll undoubtedly be doing some of them a real favor.  My landlords really annoy me because they are very neglectful of the property I live in (and probably their others as well, judging by the photos on the tax assessor&#039;s website), but if they hadn&#039;t let me live here, I would have been homeless with a baby on the way.  Think of it:  a solution to homelessness that didn&#039;t require government intervention.  I know that&#039;ll make at least some of you happy.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and:  You don&#8217;t have to be in a situation where prices will go up to make money in real estate.  With the subprime meltdown and all the foreclosures going on, the market is hurting for affordable and decent rental properties that people can live in while they are recovering financially.  I don&#8217;t know why more prospective real estate investors don&#8217;t consider landlording.  OK, I know it&#8217;s kind of a pain in the you-know-where, but you know, you have to deal with people in your daily life anyway.  You might as well be making a check from some of them that isn&#8217;t tied to your job.  And you&#8217;ll undoubtedly be doing some of them a real favor.  My landlords really annoy me because they are very neglectful of the property I live in (and probably their others as well, judging by the photos on the tax assessor&#8217;s website), but if they hadn&#8217;t let me live here, I would have been homeless with a baby on the way.  Think of it:  a solution to homelessness that didn&#8217;t require government intervention.  I know that&#8217;ll make at least some of you happy.  <img src='http://7million7years.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=197#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>When I consider rent versus buying I don&#039;t get into all the complex rationalization that a lot of PF writers seem to enjoy doing.  To me it boils down to where you&#039;ll be in fifteen or thirty years.  If you rent, the rent goes up annually and at the end of thirty years you own no real estate.  If you buy and get a fixed rate, the payment stays the same annually and you own a house free and clear when you have paid the mortgage off.  And that could be in fifteen or thirty years, or it could be a lot sooner if you make an effort to pay it off.

But I don&#039;t consider a personal home an investment, believe it or not, unless I plan to leverage some of the equity into real estate that WILL be an investment.  But that&#039;s the only time.  Otherwise, the personal home is something else entirely--to me, it says &quot;I will have a place to live no matter what.&quot;  Unless you live somewhere expensive like NYC or the major metropolitan areas of California, you will never pay as much in property taxes annually as you would in rent *or* mortgage.  That means that, outside of the government exercising eminent domain or your home being destroyed, you will never lose it.  (And you&#039;d still own the land even if the house were carried away in a tornado!)

No amount of stock or bonds can buy that security.  Wall Street is not a residential property.

But it&#039;s like savings accounts.  A lot of times I see PF writers (bloggers or not) pushing people away from savings accounts because the return is so abysmal.  Well, a savings account isn&#039;t an investment vehicle either!  It is also a security measure;  this is where you put emergency funds in case you lose your principal source of income.  You don&#039;t want to put your emergency funds someplace where there will be any delay whatsoever in getting the funds out and putting them to use.  That rules out every investment vehicle there is except money market funds.  Money market funds don&#039;t do much better in terms of interest rates than savings accounts do, and they require a higher initial deposit and a higher daily balance besides.  Not good for someone just starting out with an e-fund.

When we speak of and write about financial issues it&#039;s important to look at the issue for what it is, consider what it&#039;s designed to do and give advice from that perspective.  You can&#039;t just lump a whole bunch of entities together because they look sort of alike and give overgeneralized advice.  This is how people get into trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I consider rent versus buying I don&#8217;t get into all the complex rationalization that a lot of PF writers seem to enjoy doing.  To me it boils down to where you&#8217;ll be in fifteen or thirty years.  If you rent, the rent goes up annually and at the end of thirty years you own no real estate.  If you buy and get a fixed rate, the payment stays the same annually and you own a house free and clear when you have paid the mortgage off.  And that could be in fifteen or thirty years, or it could be a lot sooner if you make an effort to pay it off.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t consider a personal home an investment, believe it or not, unless I plan to leverage some of the equity into real estate that WILL be an investment.  But that&#8217;s the only time.  Otherwise, the personal home is something else entirely&#8211;to me, it says &#8220;I will have a place to live no matter what.&#8221;  Unless you live somewhere expensive like NYC or the major metropolitan areas of California, you will never pay as much in property taxes annually as you would in rent *or* mortgage.  That means that, outside of the government exercising eminent domain or your home being destroyed, you will never lose it.  (And you&#8217;d still own the land even if the house were carried away in a tornado!)</p>
<p>No amount of stock or bonds can buy that security.  Wall Street is not a residential property.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s like savings accounts.  A lot of times I see PF writers (bloggers or not) pushing people away from savings accounts because the return is so abysmal.  Well, a savings account isn&#8217;t an investment vehicle either!  It is also a security measure;  this is where you put emergency funds in case you lose your principal source of income.  You don&#8217;t want to put your emergency funds someplace where there will be any delay whatsoever in getting the funds out and putting them to use.  That rules out every investment vehicle there is except money market funds.  Money market funds don&#8217;t do much better in terms of interest rates than savings accounts do, and they require a higher initial deposit and a higher daily balance besides.  Not good for someone just starting out with an e-fund.</p>
<p>When we speak of and write about financial issues it&#8217;s important to look at the issue for what it is, consider what it&#8217;s designed to do and give advice from that perspective.  You can&#8217;t just lump a whole bunch of entities together because they look sort of alike and give overgeneralized advice.  This is how people get into trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJC</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>AJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=197#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>@ Di - Insurance is a &#039;product&#039; .... product implies overhead: somebody has to package, sell, and then manage the &#039;product&#039;. So, why not just go to the underlying investment? Hmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Di &#8211; Insurance is a &#8216;product&#8217; &#8230;. product implies overhead: somebody has to package, sell, and then manage the &#8216;product&#8217;. So, why not just go to the underlying investment? Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Di Eats the Elephant</title>
		<link>http://7million7years.com/2008/06/17/millionaire-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Di Eats the Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7million7years.wordpress.com/?p=197#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Good post, AJ.  I checked out Clever Dude&#039;s blog and read all those comments as well and it was very enlightening.  I have one of those &quot;almost&quot; no money down (80/20) mortgages.  I have never considered life insurance to be a good deal, but again it appears that the author is viewing that as a low-risk option along the double-your-money-in-7-years mentality.  I&#039;ve got other plans, but it does give me more options for another day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, AJ.  I checked out Clever Dude&#8217;s blog and read all those comments as well and it was very enlightening.  I have one of those &#8220;almost&#8221; no money down (80/20) mortgages.  I have never considered life insurance to be a good deal, but again it appears that the author is viewing that as a low-risk option along the double-your-money-in-7-years mentality.  I&#8217;ve got other plans, but it does give me more options for another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

